The Apocalypse Has Been Deferred Pending Calendar Availability

9 views

The planet is having a medical emergency.

Humanity has responded by opening Outlook.

According to Reuters, governments are deadlocked over when to publish the next major assessments from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The delay could leave crucial reports unavailable for the climate negotiations scheduled for 2028.

We have apparently reached the point where the fire alarm needs a mutually convenient appointment.

Subject: RE: RE: RE: Planet on Fire
Status: Awaiting stakeholder alignment
Priority: High, but please respect everyone’s availability

Some countries want more time so scientists with fewer resources can participate properly. That is a serious concern. An international scientific assessment should not become a private conversation between whichever countries can afford to send the most people.

But that makes the obvious question even more irritating:

Why aren’t we funding their participation?

We can find money for missiles that cross continents. Surely we can find money for the scientist explaining why those continents are becoming increasingly difficult to inhabit.

Apparently, “could we pay people to help?” is a radical proposal. “Could we postpone the consequences of not helping?” has considerably more institutional support.

Meanwhile, the atmosphere remains an appallingly uncooperative stakeholder.

It refuses to wait for the revised work plan. It has not read the terms of reference. Nobody has managed to persuade a wildfire to hold off until the minutes are approved.

I spent years in corporate environments. I recognise this machinery.

An urgent problem enters a meeting. It leaves as six actions, three working groups and a shared document nobody owns. At the next meeting, everyone agrees the problem remains urgent.

Someone requests a dashboard.

The dashboard turns red.

Someone requests different colours.

This process is exhausting when the subject is customer service. When the subject is whether our children can live comfortably on Earth, it becomes a spectacularly expensive form of taking the piss.

And nature gets no calendar invitation.

The animals do not have a delegation negotiating an extension. A forest cannot submit a funding request. A bird cannot explain that its nesting season has become incompatible with the weather, then ask whether there is an escalation procedure.

They simply endure what we decide.

Or fail to decide.

That is the part that makes me sad beneath all the sarcasm. We have given ourselves extraordinary power over living things that never agreed to our management.

Then we behave like the department that loses the paperwork.

We are clever enough to build instruments that measure changes across the entire planet. Clever enough to compare decades of evidence. Clever enough to understand that decisions made now have consequences long after the people making them have retired.

And somehow, all that intelligence keeps arriving at:

“Let’s revisit this.”

Fine.

Let’s revisit the funding. The staffing. The barriers keeping scientists out. Let’s give the people doing the work what they need to do it.

Because another round of solemn concern is not going to provide shade, restore a habitat or put out a fire.

The next meeting should end with resources and decisions.

If it ends with a date for another meeting, perhaps we should let an orangutan chair the following one.

At least it has a clear interest in keeping the forest standing.

---

Source: Reuters, “Inside the deadlock at the world’s top climate science body,” October 9, 2026. This article is satirical commentary; the meeting dialogue is fictional.